Apex Web Compliance

Website accessibility, maintained

Fix the barriers.
Keep them from coming back.

We identify and remediate accessibility barriers on customer-facing websites—then monitor future changes that can introduce them again.

Request a free review See a sample finding
  • Evidence-led review
  • Practical remediation
  • Ongoing monitoring

Monitoring summary

Website health

Review ready
74/100
4 priority barriers found Automated checks require manual validation.
Color contrastText may be difficult to read
High
Keyboard accessInteractive control needs review
High
Image alternativesMissing descriptive text
Medium
Last reviewedToday, 9:42 AM

Built around recognized accessibility practices

WCAG-informedCode-level fixesHuman validationClear documentation

What we do

From a vague risk to a clear action plan.

Automated scanners are useful signals—not final answers. We combine testing evidence with practical review so your team knows what matters and what to fix first.

01

Accessibility review

We examine key customer journeys and surface barriers affecting navigation, readability, forms, and content.

  • Prioritized findings
  • Supporting evidence
  • Plain-language recommendations
02 Core service

Website remediation

We correct confirmed accessibility barriers in the underlying website—not merely cover them with an overlay.

  • Code and content updates
  • Keyboard and form improvements
  • Post-remediation verification
03

Continuous monitoring

We watch for new issues introduced by content, plugin, theme, or design changes and notify you when attention is needed.

  • Scheduled checks
  • Change alerts
  • Dated monthly reports

A practical process

Evidence first.
Fixes second.
Monitoring always.

No mystery scores and no one-click compliance claims. You receive a clear record of what was found, what was changed, and what needs continued attention.

  1. 01

    Review

    We inspect the website and validate priority barriers on important pages and user flows.

  2. 02

    Remediate

    Confirmed issues are corrected at the code and content level, then checked again.

  3. 03

    Maintain

    Optional monitoring helps detect regressions after future website changes.

Clear evidence

See the issue before deciding what to do.

Every preliminary review separates machine-detected signals from findings that require human validation. We document affected elements and explain the user impact without overstating the result.

Example finding Button text has insufficient contrast against its background, which may make the action difficult to identify for users with low vision.
PRELIMINARY REVIEW

PRIORITY FINDING 01

Insufficient color contrast

SeverityHighReferenceWCAG 1.4.3
Book an appointment

Text and interactive controls should maintain sufficient contrast so they remain perceivable across a range of vision conditions and displays.

Manual validation recommended

Apex Website Protection

Accessibility is not a one-time checkbox.

New pages, plugins, themes, and content can introduce new barriers. Continuous monitoring creates a repeatable record and brings changes to your attention sooner.

30 days included with every remediation engagement.

Continuous monitoring

$39/ month

Cancel anytime. Remediation work is quoted separately.

  • Weekly checks of up to 10 pages
  • Alerts when priority signals change
  • Dated monthly monitoring report
  • Accessibility score history
  • Basic uptime and SSL monitoring
Ask about monitoring

Start with clarity

Request a free preliminary accessibility review.

Send us your website. We’ll take an initial look and let you know whether a deeper review appears worthwhile.

  • No obligation
  • No automated compliance claims
  • Response from a real person

We use your details only to respond to this request. See our Privacy Policy.

Questions, answered

Before you begin.

No. Automated testing can identify useful signals, but it cannot evaluate every accessibility requirement or user journey. Manual validation is an important part of a responsible review.